bvise

SAP Warehouse Robotics

Dina Ruthop — Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:26:30 +0000

30.06.2026

SAP Warehouse Robotics

Expansion of Integration with SAP Warehouse Robotics

How Modern Warehouse Automation Seamlessly Integrates into the SAP Ecosystem

Robots in warehouses are no longer a thing of the future. Autonomous mobile robots, automated guided vehicles, and shuttle solutions are now handling transport, order picking, and replenishment processes.
When they’re integrated into your company’s SAP system landscape, they can reach their full potential. And that brings us to SAP Warehouse Robotics.

What is SAP Warehouse Robotics?

SAP Warehouse Robotics is not a single robot, but rather a standardized integration layer between SAP Extended Warehouse Management (SAP EWM) and robotics solutions from various manufacturers. SAP controls the logic and processes—the robots carry them out.

SAP EWM then communicates via clearly defined interfaces with a Robotics Resource Management (RRM) component, which in turn connects the individual robot fleets. The result: fewer custom interfaces, more standardization, and greater security.

Many warehouses start with a clearly defined robotics use case, such as:
• Transporting goods from the receiving area to the storage zone
• Replenishing picking stations
• Removing goods from packing stations

Increasing Level of Automation = Enhanced Integration

It is quite normal for the level of automation to continue to grow over time. However, this also means that requirements increase:

More types of robots
More processes
Greater dynamics in the warehouse

This is where we need enhanced integration: It ensures that SAP EWM remains the central control hub even in more complex scenarios. Typical enhancement scenarios in practice:

Automate Additional Process Steps
Robots not only handle transportation but are also actively integrated into picking, production, and cross-docking processes.
Orchestrate Multiple Robot Fleets
Different manufacturers, different capabilities—SAP Warehouse Robotics enables unified control via standardized services.
Intelligent Order Assignment
Through extensions, order distribution can take into account criteria such as priority, distance, battery status, or utilization.
Real-Time Transparency in the Warehouse.
Status updates from the robots are fed directly back into the SAP system—for monitoring, reporting, and rapid response to malfunctions.

SAP Warehouse Robotics: Thought out from a technical perspective—but implemented pragmatically

The integration is based on SAP EWM (S/4HANA and later), the Warehouse Robotics Framework, and standardized interfaces. As always, the guiding principle is: as much standardization as possible, as much customization as necessary. You benefit from this integration in several ways:

Faster scaling as throughput increases
Easier integration of new robotics solutions
Clear separation of process logic and execution
Investment protection through SAP standards

In short: The warehouse is not only becoming more automated, but also more controllable.

Does this sound like you?

Expanding integration with SAP Warehouse Robotics is a strategic step toward a smart, flexible, and future-proof warehouse. By adopting a clean, SAP-based integration architecture early on, you lay the foundation for further automation—without the proliferation of interfaces.

Book your initial consultation now to learn more!

The post SAP Warehouse Robotics first appeared on bvise.

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

Dina Ruthop — Fri, 02 Oct 2026 14:38:11 +0000

12.01.2026

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

When warehouses and inventories work in sync: Goods Movements in EWM & Inventory Management.

Anyone who works with SAP EWM (Extended Warehouse Management) and Inventory Management (IM) is familiar with the issue: goods transactions take place everywhere—in the warehouse, in production, in goods receipt, during stock transfers—and yet, at the end of the day, inventories and postings must match up perfectly.
It sounds simple enough, but in practice, this is often where things get tricky.

EWM vs. IM: two worlds, one goal

Inventory Management (IM)

Accounting perspective
Inventory at warehouse level
FI/CO-relevant
“What belongs to us?”

EWM

Logistical perspective
Warehouse structure (bins, HUs, resources, tasks)
Physical flow of goods
“Where is everything located and how does it move?”

Both systems therefore have different perspectives—but they must work in sync to ensure that planning, controlling, and operations run smoothly.

Goods Movements: Who will start?

Depending on the process, there are two typical scenarios:

1. IM leads, EWM follows

Classic flow in S/4HANA integration. Example: Goods receipt or transfer posting via MIGO.

IM posting generates an “Expected Goods Movement” in EWM.
EWM executes physical warehouse processes (putaway task, HU handling).
Completion in EWM → confirmation back to IM.

2. EWM leads, IM follows

Ideal for highly automated warehouses. Example: stock transfer in the warehouse, internal transports, consolidations.

EWM creates and confirms warehouse tasks.
Upon completion, EWM automatically triggers the appropriate IM posting code.

Where things often go wrong (and how to do it better)

❌ Double bookings or missing feedback
❌ Different inventories in EWM vs. IM
❌ Manual workarounds (Excel says hello)
❌ Complex mapping tables that no one understands

Why goods movements are so much smarter in EWM

EWM is not “just another warehouse,” but a process engine:

✅ Strategies (putaway/picking)
✅ Resource control
✅ HU management
✅ Lab orders, quality checks
✅ Automation (MFS, RF, bots)

While IM says “inventory -10 items,” EWM says “employee A fetches pallet 123 from bin 05-01-02.” So EWM thinks operationally, IM thinks accounting-wise – goods movement is the bridge between the two.

IM & EWM become a dream team when….

the processes are clearly modeled….
the integration is configured correctly….
everyone knows where to post (IM or EWM)….
movements are not controlled twice, but in a targeted manner.

This results in transparent warehouse movements, accurate inventory, and valid accounting. All in all: an efficient supply chain.

Our Conclusion

Goods movements in EWM and IM are not an “either/or” situation, but rather a perfect interplay between two perspectives.
Those who understand the logic behind this and integrate it properly will reap the benefits:

Fewer errors
Real-time data
Efficient processes
High level of automation
Better basis for decision-making

If you want to know how to intelligently combine complex movement logic, process types, HU flows, or inventories in EWM & IM, we are happy to support you. Relaxed in conversation, professional in implementation.

The post Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management first appeared on bvise.

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

Dina Ruthop — Thu, 03 Sep 2026 06:39:55 +0000

12.01.2026

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

When warehouses and inventories work in sync: Goods Movements in EWM & Inventory Management.

EWM vs. IM: two worlds, one goal

Inventory Management (IM)

Accounting perspective
Inventory at warehouse level
FI/CO-relevant
“What belongs to us?”

EWM

Logistical perspective
Warehouse structure (bins, HUs, resources, tasks)
Physical flow of goods
“Where is everything located and how does it move?”

Both systems therefore have different perspectives—but they must work in sync to ensure that planning, controlling, and operations run smoothly.

Goods Movements: Who will start?

Depending on the process, there are two typical scenarios:

1. IM leads, EWM follows

Classic flow in S/4HANA integration. Example: Goods receipt or transfer posting via MIGO.

IM posting generates an “Expected Goods Movement” in EWM.
EWM executes physical warehouse processes (putaway task, HU handling).
Completion in EWM → confirmation back to IM.

2. EWM leads, IM follows

Ideal for highly automated warehouses. Example: stock transfer in the warehouse, internal transports, consolidations.

EWM creates and confirms warehouse tasks.
Upon completion, EWM automatically triggers the appropriate IM posting code.

Where things often go wrong (and how to do it better)

❌ Double bookings or missing feedback
❌ Different inventories in EWM vs. IM
❌ Manual workarounds (Excel says hello)
❌ Complex mapping tables that no one understands

Why goods movements are so much smarter in EWM

EWM is not “just another warehouse,” but a process engine:

✅ Strategies (putaway/picking)
✅ Resource control
✅ HU management
✅ Lab orders, quality checks
✅ Automation (MFS, RF, bots)

IM & EWM become a dream team when….

the processes are clearly modeled….
the integration is configured correctly….
everyone knows where to post (IM or EWM)….
movements are not controlled twice, but in a targeted manner.

This results in transparent warehouse movements, accurate inventory, and valid accounting. All in all: an efficient supply chain.

Our Conclusion

Fewer errors
Real-time data
Efficient processes
High level of automation
Better basis for decision-making

The post Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management first appeared on bvise.

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

Dina Ruthop — Sun, 19 Jul 2026 10:32:02 +0000

12.01.2026

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

When warehouses and inventories work in sync: Goods Movements in EWM & Inventory Management.

EWM vs. IM: two worlds, one goal

Inventory Management (IM)

Accounting perspective
Inventory at warehouse level
FI/CO-relevant
“What belongs to us?”

EWM

Logistical perspective
Warehouse structure (bins, HUs, resources, tasks)
Physical flow of goods
“Where is everything located and how does it move?”

Both systems therefore have different perspectives—but they must work in sync to ensure that planning, controlling, and operations run smoothly.

Goods Movements: Who will start?

Depending on the process, there are two typical scenarios:

1. IM leads, EWM follows

Classic flow in S/4HANA integration. Example: Goods receipt or transfer posting via MIGO.

IM posting generates an “Expected Goods Movement” in EWM.
EWM executes physical warehouse processes (putaway task, HU handling).
Completion in EWM → confirmation back to IM.

2. EWM leads, IM follows

Ideal for highly automated warehouses. Example: stock transfer in the warehouse, internal transports, consolidations.

EWM creates and confirms warehouse tasks.
Upon completion, EWM automatically triggers the appropriate IM posting code.

Where things often go wrong (and how to do it better)

❌ Double bookings or missing feedback
❌ Different inventories in EWM vs. IM
❌ Manual workarounds (Excel says hello)
❌ Complex mapping tables that no one understands

Why goods movements are so much smarter in EWM

EWM is not “just another warehouse,” but a process engine:

✅ Strategies (putaway/picking)
✅ Resource control
✅ HU management
✅ Lab orders, quality checks
✅ Automation (MFS, RF, bots)

IM & EWM become a dream team when….

the processes are clearly modeled….
the integration is configured correctly….
everyone knows where to post (IM or EWM)….
movements are not controlled twice, but in a targeted manner.

This results in transparent warehouse movements, accurate inventory, and valid accounting. All in all: an efficient supply chain.

Our Conclusion

Fewer errors
Real-time data
Efficient processes
High level of automation
Better basis for decision-making

The post Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management first appeared on bvise.

SAP Warehouse Robotics

Dina Ruthop — Tue, 30 Jun 2026 19:32:08 +0000

30.06.2026

SAP Warehouse Robotics

Expansion of Integration with SAP Warehouse Robotics

How Modern Warehouse Automation Seamlessly Integrates into the SAP Ecosystem

What is SAP Warehouse Robotics?

Increasing Level of Automation = Enhanced Integration

It is quite normal for the level of automation to continue to grow over time. However, this also means that requirements increase:

More types of robots
More processes
Greater dynamics in the warehouse

This is where we need enhanced integration: It ensures that SAP EWM remains the central control hub even in more complex scenarios. Typical enhancement scenarios in practice:

Automate Additional Process Steps
Robots not only handle transportation but are also actively integrated into picking, production, and cross-docking processes.
Orchestrate Multiple Robot Fleets
Different manufacturers, different capabilities—SAP Warehouse Robotics enables unified control via standardized services.
Intelligent Order Assignment
Through extensions, order distribution can take into account criteria such as priority, distance, battery status, or utilization.
Real-Time Transparency in the Warehouse.
Status updates from the robots are fed directly back into the SAP system—for monitoring, reporting, and rapid response to malfunctions.

SAP Warehouse Robotics: Thought out from a technical perspective—but implemented pragmatically

Faster scaling as throughput increases
Easier integration of new robotics solutions
Clear separation of process logic and execution
Investment protection through SAP standards

In short: The warehouse is not only becoming more automated, but also more controllable.

Does this sound like you?

Book your initial consultation now to learn more!

The post SAP Warehouse Robotics first appeared on bvise.

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

Dina Ruthop — Fri, 24 Apr 2026 14:54:33 +0000

12.01.2026

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

When warehouses and inventories work in sync: Goods Movements in EWM & Inventory Management.

EWM vs. IM: two worlds, one goal

Inventory Management (IM)

Accounting perspective
Inventory at warehouse level
FI/CO-relevant
“What belongs to us?”

EWM

Logistical perspective
Warehouse structure (bins, HUs, resources, tasks)
Physical flow of goods
“Where is everything located and how does it move?”

Both systems therefore have different perspectives—but they must work in sync to ensure that planning, controlling, and operations run smoothly.

Goods Movements: Who will start?

Depending on the process, there are two typical scenarios:

1. IM leads, EWM follows

Classic flow in S/4HANA integration. Example: Goods receipt or transfer posting via MIGO.

IM posting generates an “Expected Goods Movement” in EWM.
EWM executes physical warehouse processes (putaway task, HU handling).
Completion in EWM → confirmation back to IM.

2. EWM leads, IM follows

Ideal for highly automated warehouses. Example: stock transfer in the warehouse, internal transports, consolidations.

EWM creates and confirms warehouse tasks.
Upon completion, EWM automatically triggers the appropriate IM posting code.

Where things often go wrong (and how to do it better)

❌ Double bookings or missing feedback
❌ Different inventories in EWM vs. IM
❌ Manual workarounds (Excel says hello)
❌ Complex mapping tables that no one understands

Why goods movements are so much smarter in EWM

EWM is not “just another warehouse,” but a process engine:

✅ Strategies (putaway/picking)
✅ Resource control
✅ HU management
✅ Lab orders, quality checks
✅ Automation (MFS, RF, bots)

IM & EWM become a dream team when….

the processes are clearly modeled….
the integration is configured correctly….
everyone knows where to post (IM or EWM)….
movements are not controlled twice, but in a targeted manner.

This results in transparent warehouse movements, accurate inventory, and valid accounting. All in all: an efficient supply chain.

Our Conclusion

Fewer errors
Real-time data
Efficient processes
High level of automation
Better basis for decision-making

The post Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management first appeared on bvise.

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

Dina Ruthop — Sun, 01 Mar 2026 12:05:22 +0000

12.01.2026

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

When warehouses and inventories work in sync: Goods Movements in EWM & Inventory Management.

EWM vs. IM: two worlds, one goal

Inventory Management (IM)

Accounting perspective
Inventory at warehouse level
FI/CO-relevant
“What belongs to us?”

EWM

Logistical perspective
Warehouse structure (bins, HUs, resources, tasks)
Physical flow of goods
“Where is everything located and how does it move?”

Both systems therefore have different perspectives—but they must work in sync to ensure that planning, controlling, and operations run smoothly.

Goods Movements: Who will start?

Depending on the process, there are two typical scenarios:

1. IM leads, EWM follows

Classic flow in S/4HANA integration. Example: Goods receipt or transfer posting via MIGO.

IM posting generates an “Expected Goods Movement” in EWM.
EWM executes physical warehouse processes (putaway task, HU handling).
Completion in EWM → confirmation back to IM.

2. EWM leads, IM follows

Ideal for highly automated warehouses. Example: stock transfer in the warehouse, internal transports, consolidations.

EWM creates and confirms warehouse tasks.
Upon completion, EWM automatically triggers the appropriate IM posting code.

Where things often go wrong (and how to do it better)

❌ Double bookings or missing feedback
❌ Different inventories in EWM vs. IM
❌ Manual workarounds (Excel says hello)
❌ Complex mapping tables that no one understands

Why goods movements are so much smarter in EWM

EWM is not “just another warehouse,” but a process engine:

✅ Strategies (putaway/picking)
✅ Resource control
✅ HU management
✅ Lab orders, quality checks
✅ Automation (MFS, RF, bots)

IM & EWM become a dream team when….

the processes are clearly modeled….
the integration is configured correctly….
everyone knows where to post (IM or EWM)….
movements are not controlled twice, but in a targeted manner.

This results in transparent warehouse movements, accurate inventory, and valid accounting. All in all: an efficient supply chain.

Our Conclusion

Fewer errors
Real-time data
Efficient processes
High level of automation
Better basis for decision-making

The post Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management first appeared on bvise.

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

Dina Ruthop — Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:30:39 +0000

12.01.2026

Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management

When warehouses and inventories work in sync: Goods Movements in EWM & Inventory Management.

EWM vs. IM: two worlds, one goal

Inventory Management (IM)

Accounting perspective
Inventory at warehouse level
FI/CO-relevant
“What belongs to us?”

EWM

Logistical perspective
Warehouse structure (bins, HUs, resources, tasks)
Physical flow of goods
“Where is everything located and how does it move?”

Both systems therefore have different perspectives—but they must work in sync to ensure that planning, controlling, and operations run smoothly.

Goods Movements: Who will start?

Depending on the process, there are two typical scenarios:

1. IM leads, EWM follows

Classic flow in S/4HANA integration. Example: Goods receipt or transfer posting via MIGO.

IM posting generates an “Expected Goods Movement” in EWM.
EWM executes physical warehouse processes (putaway task, HU handling).
Completion in EWM → confirmation back to IM.

2. EWM leads, IM follows

Ideal for highly automated warehouses. Example: stock transfer in the warehouse, internal transports, consolidations.

EWM creates and confirms warehouse tasks.
Upon completion, EWM automatically triggers the appropriate IM posting code.

Where things often go wrong (and how to do it better)

❌ Double bookings or missing feedback
❌ Different inventories in EWM vs. IM
❌ Manual workarounds (Excel says hello)
❌ Complex mapping tables that no one understands

Why goods movements are so much smarter in EWM

EWM is not “just another warehouse,” but a process engine:

✅ Strategies (putaway/picking)
✅ Resource control
✅ HU management
✅ Lab orders, quality checks
✅ Automation (MFS, RF, bots)

IM & EWM become a dream team when….

the processes are clearly modeled….
the integration is configured correctly….
everyone knows where to post (IM or EWM)….
movements are not controlled twice, but in a targeted manner.

This results in transparent warehouse movements, accurate inventory, and valid accounting. All in all: an efficient supply chain.

Our Conclusion

Fewer errors
Real-time data
Efficient processes
High level of automation
Better basis for decision-making

The post Goods Movement in EWM & Inventory Management first appeared on bvise.

Quality certificates in goods receipt with synchronous goods posting

Dina Ruthop — Mon, 17 Nov 2025 15:28:25 +0000

18.11.2025

Quality certificates in goods receipt with synchronous goods posting

Why smart processes such as quality certificates in goods receipt with synchronous goods posting in SAP are doubly worthwhile

When everything runs smoothly in goods receipt, the whole company is happy. But in reality? Sometimes a test certificate is missing, the goods are booked anyway, quality problems arise later, and suddenly the big search for the cause begins. Sounds familiar? Then Quality Certificates in conjunction with synchronous goods booking is the right topic for you!

Why are quality certificates so important in goods receipt?

Quality certificates (e.g., test certificates according to DIN EN 10204 such as 2.2 or 3.1) serve as proof that the goods meet certain quality requirements.

Ideally, they should be available before or at the latest upon receipt of goods. In practice, this means:

✅ Faster release of goods
✅ Fewer manual checks
✅ Traceability and compliance
✅ Better supplier management

If the certificate is missing, the goods are either blocked or booked “on spec”—many companies book them “somehow” first and clarify the rest later. Both cost time and nerves and lead to:

❌ Duplication of work
❌ Unclear inventories
❌ Stress with finance and QA

Book synchronously + check certificate = efficiency

SAP offers the option of posting goods receipts synchronously – i.e., including all relevant quality data. The process can be designed so that the system automatically checks whether a valid certificate has been stored. This is how it could look:

Supplier sends certificate in advance (e.g., via portal, EDI, API).
SAP stores and links the certificate to the purchase order.
Goods receipt is posted (only if certificate is available or has been checked).
In case of discrepancies → automatic block or workflow to QA.
Transparent history for audits and supplier evaluation.

The result: No subsequent search for slips of paper, less manual rework, and clear processes. Posting, certificate, and, if applicable, quality batch end up together in the system. This ensures:

✅ Real-time transparency
✅ Stable inventory levels
✅ Clean data for MRP & controlling
✅ Faster throughput times

Technical implementation? Flexible!

Depending on the system landscape, there are different ways to address this issue:

SAP QM with certificate verification and quality lots
SAP S/4HANA Fiori apps for intuitive goods receipts
Inbound workflows (SAP BTP / Workflow Management)
Supplier Portal / Fiori App for suppliers
Integration via EDI / API (e.g., test certificates as PDF or structured data)
Important: Process + technology must be considered together.

Our Conclusion

Quality certificates in goods receipt with synchronous goods posting in SAP ensure less chaos, higher quality, and better data.

With the right setup, a “tedious mandatory step” becomes a real competitive advantage: automated, transparent, audit-proof, and supplier-friendly.

Want to learn more? We are happy to help you with process and system design.
From analysis and integration to supplier onboarding. Feel free to contact us!

The post Quality certificates in goods receipt with synchronous goods posting first appeared on bvise.

Integration of SAP RPM

Dina Ruthop — Fri, 01 Aug 2025 06:16:28 +0000

01.08.2025

Integration of SAP RPM

RPM – greater transparency and sustainability in the supply chain

With the SAP S/4HANA release, SAP has taken an important step toward sustainable and traceable packaging cycles: the introduction of Serialized Returnable Packaging Materials (RPM). This new feature enables companies to seamlessly track reusable packaging such as crates, containers, or pallets—bringing not only environmental but also economic benefits.

What are Serialized Returnable Packaging Materials?

Returnable packaging materials (RPM) are durable packaging carriers that are used multiple times between suppliers and customers—for example, mesh boxes, plastic containers, or special pallets. With the serialization of these packaging materials, SAP is introducing a unique identification for each individual carrier—similar to serial numbers for devices or machines.

The aim of the solution:

Transparency regarding the location, use, and condition of each packaging carrier
Prevention of shrinkage and stock shortages
Improved return processes
Contribution to the circular economy and CO₂ reduction

How does Serialized RPM in SAP work?

With the new release, companies can assign a unique serial number to each individual RPM. This number is tracked across all relevant movements – from shipping to return:

Serial number assignment during goods issue
Integration into delivery and transport processes
Inventory management in the warehouse (e.g., EWM-compatible)
Tracking in case of loss or damage
Return processes with assignment of the original RPM serial number

Advantages of serialization of reusable packaging

Transparency throughout the entire life cycle: Each packaging carrier can be clearly identified and tracked throughout its entire circulation—including location and status.
More efficient return processes: Knowing exactly when and where packaging was delivered allows returns to be planned and automated in a targeted manner.
Avoidance of costs due to shrinkage: Loss and mix-ups of reusable containers are among the most common causes of unnecessary costs in packaging management. Serialization drastically reduces this risk.
Sustainability & reporting: Reusable packaging can be better controlled and utilized. This actively supports companies in implementing ESG strategies and CO₂ accounting.

Practical application scenarios:

Automotive industry: Transport of components in reusable special boxes
Food industry: Tracking of hygiene containers in the cold chain process
Retail & wholesale: Circulation of pallets or crates between central warehouses and stores
Logistics service providers: Pool management of rental packaging for various customers

Conclusion: A small tool with a big impact

The Serialized Returnable Packaging Materials function is a small but strategically important feature in the SAP release. It bridges the gap between logistics, sustainability, and digitalization, giving you as a company the opportunity to make your packaging logistics more efficient and transparent. Especially against the backdrop of increasing regulatory requirements and growing environmental responsibility, this innovation is a practical lever for making processes smarter and greener.

Feel free to contact us and we will discuss how it can work for you!

The post Integration of SAP RPM first appeared on bvise.